Human activity impacts the natural environment. One example of such an impact is energy production, including energy from renewable sources. The aim of this study was to analyse and assess changes in the state of the environment in 2008, 2015 and 2023, resulting from the development and structure of renewable energy sources in EU countries. Three research questions were formulated: Question 1 (Q1). Is the state of the environment in most EU countries characterised by variability in terms of the level of renewable energy development? Question 2 (Q2). Has the composition of the group of EU countries with the highest environmental status changed? Question 3 (Q3). Is the group of EU countries with the highest environmental status characterised by a diverse structure of renewable energy sources used? The study covers three key periods: 2008, 2015 and 2023. This approach allows for the identification of the impact of crisis factors on the relationship between the energy transition and environmental status. The evaluation applied the TOPSIS, EDAS and Ward’s methods. Based on a substantive and formal analysis, diagnostic variables were selected: 18 describing the structure and level of RES development, 7 economic indicators and 11 reflecting the environmental status of EU countries. The selection criterion was data availability, with sources drawn from the EUROSTAT, IRENA and World Bank Group databases. The results show that the main leaders were Italy, Sweden, France and Germany, with Austria and Denmark maintaining high positions only in 2008. Italy took the lead in 2015 and retained it in 2023 thanks to extensive emission reductions, while Finland joined the top group. Poland and Lithuania ranked last in 2015 and 2023. A growing gap was also observed between the leaders and the lowest-performing countries. Among the highest-ranked countries, hydropower was the dominant RES, while in Germany and Denmark, wind energy and biofuels also played a key role. Cluster analysis using Ward’s method confirmed the diversity of environmental and energy profiles, as well as Belgium’s distinct position. The study confirms the instability of most EU countries’ positions, the persistence of a small group of leaders and widening disparities in sustainable environmental development within the EU.
Latosińska et al. (Tue,) studied this question.