This article examines the critical issue of preventing major industrial accidents in alignment with the SEVESO III directive. It presents a comparative analysis of the current situations in Slovakia and Estonia concerning the potential for industrial accidents, which pose significant risks to critical transport infrastructure. The destruction of such infrastructure not only hinders transportation capabilities but also complicates emergency response efforts during incidents, leading to challenges in safeguarding human lives and ensuring efficient mobility. Both Slovakia and Estonia, European Union member states with comparable geographic sizes, demonstrate notable differences in their population densities while maintaining a similar number of enterprises. This study aims to elucidate the similarities and differences in their approaches to risk assessment and accident prevention strategies. Through a comprehensive examination of the practices employed in both countries, we intend to identify the key factors that influence both accident prevention and preparedness. Furthermore, this research aspires to contribute to a deeper understanding of industrial safety measures and their implications within the framework of the SEVESO III directive, emphasizing the need for proactive solutions to mitigate risks posed to critical transport nodes.
Hollá et al. (Thu,) studied this question.