Upper hemisternotomy vs. full sternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement
Key Points
Upper hemisternotomy demonstrates lower morbidity and mortality rates for aortic replacement, highlighting its safety.
Findings show that using upper hemisternotomy can be a feasible option compared to full sternotomy in certain surgeries.
This analysis highlights the effectiveness of upper hemisternotomy for hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement.
Further larger studies are needed to validate the findings and enhance the understanding of this surgical technique.
Abstract
Low morbidity and mortality demonstrate that UHS for combined hemiarch and proximal aortic replacement is safe and feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.