Abstract Interpersonal interaction shapes brain dynamics in ways that often elude traditional linear analyses. Using electroencephalography (EEG) hyperscanning and nonlinear dynamical methods, we investigated how neural complexity and coupling within and between brains differ between joint and solitary conditions across four ecologically valid contexts: romantic kissing, resting state, pendulum observation, and music listening. Fourteen romantic couples completed each task while EEG was recorded simultaneously. Linear mixed-effects models showed that joint conditions generally enhanced inter-brain coupling, with kissing producing the strongest effects—combining elevated coupling with increased complexity. Even in resting state, with eyes open or closed, coupling increased in the absence of external stimuli, suggesting internally driven partner-oriented synchrony. Chaotic pendulum motion selectively boosted mutual synchrony, likely via heightened attentional engagement, while music listening effects varied with musical style, sex, and the frequency range of spectral estimates of nonlinear measures. Psychological ratings of romantic bond, relational dominance, and kiss quality exhibited nonlinear, often U- or V-shaped, associations with neural measures. These findings extend social neuroscience by demonstrating that nonlinear hyperscanning approaches capture flexible “hyper-brain” network dynamics tuned to the affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor demands of real-world interaction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Müller
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Ulman Lindenberger
Prostate Cancer Research
Nonlinear Dynamics
University College London
Saarland University
Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Müller et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a768bbbadf0bb9e87e5c59 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-12153-5
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: