Increasing urban vegetation coverage is associated with improved human health and well-being, reduced environmental impact of cities and enhanced urban resilience to climate change. To support evidence-based urban planning, this study quantifies the mortality benefits, equity implications and cost-benefit ratio of several scenarios of green space development in Paris by 2040, including the replacement of car-dedicated surfaces with green spaces and a best-case scenario. This quantitative health impact assessment is based on estimated changes in the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), obtained through the estimation of the dynamic effects over time using a Difference-in-Differences approach based on previous public greening interventions, and on an exposure-response relationship linking NDVI and all-cause mortality. It was conducted at the sub-municipal level (IRIS) and incorporates a social deprivation index to assess health equity implications. Vegetation costs are drawn from a previous French study estimating urban soil restoration prices. Replacing surplus on-street parking and 20% of street space with vegetation could reduce all-cause mortality by around 0.8%, while reaching 15% of vegetation coverage in each IRIS could prevent around 3% of deaths yearly in Paris as early as 2040. For all scenarios, these benefits were approximately equally distributed across deprivation levels. Predicted monetised health benefits outweigh intervention costs by 2035, with further impacts representing net gain. In conclusion, greening interventions targeting car-dedicated space in Paris would equitably improve health while supporting more sustainable and resilient cities. • Greening car-dedicated space in urban centre could significantly improve health • In Paris, one death can be averted yearly per every three hectares greened • Health benefits are consistent through deprivation quintiles • Monetised mortality benefits rapidly outweigh implementations costs
Moutet et al. (Sun,) studied this question.