Somatoform traits (e.g., health anxiety, somatic preoccupation, and bodily distress symptoms) are prevalent and pose challenges to clinical practice. Understanding their genetic basis could improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Using available summary statistics, we conducted a multivariate genome-wide association study (GWAS) and multi-omic analysis of four somatoform traits—fatigue, irritable bowel syndrome, pain intensity, and health satisfaction—in 799,429 individuals genetically similar to European reference panels. The GWAS identified 134 loci associated with a somatoform common factor, including 44 loci not significant in the input GWAS and 8 novel loci for somatoform traits. Novel loci were mechanistically informative, mapping to the DNM1 gene and the protocadherin gene cluster (PCDHA1-4), which are involved in nociceptor sensitization and synaptogenesis, respectively. Gene-property analyses highlighted an enrichment of genes involved in synaptic transmission and enriched expression in 11 brain tissues and the pituitary. Across two brain transcriptomic datasets, we identified 16 high-confidence genes whose expression in enriched tissues was associated with somatoform traits. There was substantial polygenic overlap (76-83%) between the somatoform and externalizing, internalizing, and general psychopathology factors. Somatoform polygenic scores were associated with obesity, Type 2 diabetes, and tobacco use disorder in independent biobanks. Drug repurposing analyses suggested potential therapeutic targets, including MEK inhibitors, while Mendelian randomization analyses indicated potentially protective effects of gut microbiota. Consistent with emerging medical and genetic knowledge, somatoform traits have a shared etiology and considerable polygenic overlap with psychopathology. The biological insights from drug repurposing and Mendelian randomization analyses could provide promising avenues for treatment development.
Davis et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: