With the surge in scientific publication over the years, there is an exponential rise in predatory publishing. The aim of the current study was to assess predatory journals’ awareness among clinical and non-clinical researchers. A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital, affiliated university and the research center. Both males/females, physicians, professors, researchers, students, working in a hospital, university or a research center were enrolled. The primary outcome was the awareness of predatory journals, and to identify the predictors of awareness. The estimated sample size was 369. The survey consisted of 33 questions divided into five sections: (i) General information (ii) Research publications (iii) Awareness of predatory journals (iv) Open access (v) Journal selection. The questions were either yes/no or 5-point Likert scale. An electronic survey design was used for data collection. Variables were compared by aware and unaware groups using chi-square test. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to identify the predictors of awareness. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4. Of the total 328 respondents, females were 178(54.4%), near half had bachelors/master’s degree 156(48.3%), 117(35%) were physicians, 37(11%) researchers, 17(5%) professors, and 38(12%) students. Half of the participants 167(50.9%) were aware of the term ‘predatory medical journals. Only 56(17%) reported knowing how to spot a predatory journal. 15(4.5%) have reported publishing in a predatory journal due to lack of knowledge (6/15; 40%), to meet a deadline (3/15; 20%), suggested by a colleague (3/15; 20%), or due to (1/15; 6.6%) fast publication process. Reported sources of information were; colleagues 141(42%), attending a course 78(24%), and spam emails 73(22%). 69(21%) respondents reported using Clarivate Master Journal List, 54(16%) SCImago Journal & Country Rank list, 48(15%) use DOAJ. 282(85%) didn’t hear of the educational website Think.Check.Submit. Age (p = 0.036), gender (p = 0.0007), qualification (p = 0.0002), profession (p = 0.01), working in a research center (p = 0.005), and professional training (p = 0.0006) were significantly different by predatory journal awareness. Publishing in a predatory medical journal is a global threat to the scientific community and academic integrity. Efficient steps need to be taken in order to address predatory journals’ invasion, and raising awareness.
Shaheen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.