The separation of xenon (Xe) and krypton (Kr) is very important for industrial applications and environmental protection. However, the lack of permanent dipoles, low polarizabilities arising from their spherical nature, and similar kinetic diameters make their efficient separation by porous adsorbents exceptionally challenging. This study explored the effects of pore geometry and surface polarity of a series of aluminum-based metal–organic frameworks (CAU-10-H, MIL-160, KMF-1, CAU-23) on Xe/Kr separation performance using a heteroatom engineering strategy. These MOFs are composed of AlO6 clusters and bent dicarboxylic acid linkers, enabling us to systematically investigate the effects of pore size and heteroatom types on Xe/Kr separation performance. Among them, MIL-160 has a polar linker based on furan, showing the best balance performance. At 298 K and 1.0 bar, the uptake of Xe is 4.12 mmol g−1 and the IAST selectivity is 7.63 for a Xe/Kr (20/80) mixture. The practical performance was verified by dynamic breakthrough experiments, which yielded a long Xe breakthrough time of 42.9 min g−1. Grand Canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and first-principles density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed that the enhanced performance originates from cooperative confinement and polarization effects, with the furanyl oxygen atoms providing optimal Xe-binding sites. This work clarifies the structure–property relationships governing Xe/Kr separation in aluminum-based MOFs (Al-MOFs), highlighting the potential of heteroatom engineering for designing efficient noble gas adsorbents.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
He Wang
Beijing Radiation Center
Zhiyan Zhang
Beijing Radiation Center
Yingying Xu
Guangdong University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wang et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada8cfbc08abd80d5bc300 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules31050891
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: