Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has transformed UK surgical practice, with GIRFT emphasising the need for structured and equitable training. This study explores trainee experiences of robotic surgery training within the first UK deanery to adopt a centralised robotic surgery programme. A mixed-methods cross-sectional survey was distributed to surgical trainees in the Northern Deanery, collecting quantitative data on RAS experience, expectations, and training provision. Qualitative data on perceived benefits and barriers, was analysed thematically. There were 60 survey respondents. Support for formal RAS training was near-universal (97%), and most trainees considered RAS relevant to current training (87%), and important for the future of their specialty (90%). However, 80% perceived access to RAS as inequitable across trusts within the region. Most trainees felt competent to observe robotic cases, complete simulation modules, and bedside assist by ST3–4 level, with many reporting readiness for supervised console operating during mid-stage higher training. Mean exposure included 21 ± 21 observed cases, 10.3 ± 12.8 simulation hours, 25 ± 30 bedside-assisted cases, and 4 ± 9 console cases. Perceived impacts of RAS on training were mixed: 21% reported positive effects, 47% negative effects, and 32% neutral. 77% of trainees agreed that access to robotics would influence where they work as a consultant. Thematically, trainees valued “availability of robotic systems”, “consultant engagement and training culture”, “structured training pathways and curriculum”, and “simulation-based training”. Trainees feel competent for early development in simulation, and bedside skills but there remains limited console access locally. There is trainee consensus to necessitate recognition of RAS training formally in the ISCP curriculum.
Saunders et al. (Wed,) studied this question.