The ontological categorization of the cellular elements of the brain was proposed over a century ago by Santiago Ramón y Cajal (neurons, astroglia) and Pío del Río-Hortega (oligodendroglia, microglia). It combines histochemical observations of morphology with allied inferences about the specialized functions and origins (ectoderm or mesoderm) of each cellular element. This ontology shapes modern neuroscience, with the main non-neuronal cells—astroglia, oligodendroglia and microglia—viewed as having distinct primary roles relating respectively to the metabolic support, myelination and immunoprotection of neurons, the information signaling cells. Yet contemporary techniques, ranging from electrophysiology to single-cell transcriptomics and ultrahigh resolution spectroscopy, are revealing intersecting molecular profiles and functional capacities of these cell groups, for example metabolic support, neuroimmune and signaling functions in oligodendroglia. Here we identify discrepancies in current glial paradigms, from empirical, evolutionary and pragmatic perspectives. We suggest a subset of small, iron-rich glial cells, usually with few processes, often viewed as oligodendroglia with myelin-related primary functions, instead have iron-related primary functions that are central to all aspects of brain activity. We call these ‘ferriglia’. We discuss implications for pathogenesis across the spectrum of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders, including neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease and other less common cognitive, movement and neurobehavioral disorders, stroke and cerebrovascular disease, glioblastoma and other brain cancers and neuroimmune conditions. We also briefly address the question of where ferriglia may reside within existing glial compartments and lineages, implications for the ontological classification of other glial cells, and research challenges that must be overcome going forward.
Milward et al. (Fri,) studied this question.