This study compares the performance of two wind farm sites located in Northern Europe: an onshore site and an offshore area in the eastern Baltic Sea region. This study investigates the optimisation of wind farm performance within a fixed project area by maximising annual energy production (AEP) and increasing energy density. Three wake-loss scenarios (≤10%, ≤15%, and ≤20%) were examined to assess the sensitivity of layout optimisation to aerodynamic interaction constraints. Several layout configurations were analysed to reduce wake losses and enhance overall energy output. Wind conditions were assessed using NORA3 reanalysis data, and wake interactions were modelled using the Jensen wake model to estimate AEP. Both wind farms were further compared across key criteria, including cost, power generation efficiency, installation and maintenance requirements, and site availability. Offshore wind farms achieve 1.5–1.7 times higher energy density under similar spatial conditions. However, offshore levelised cost of energy (LCOE) remains roughly 25% higher due to higher capital and infrastructure costs, while onshore LCOE demonstrates better economic performance, driven by lower CAPEX and O&M expenses. The findings highlight the trade-offs between cost efficiency and wake-driven energy performance for onshore and offshore wind development in the eastern Baltic Sea region.
Orlova et al. (Fri,) studied this question.