With China’s urban growthism past its peak, urban development has shifted from incremental expansion to inventory quality improvement. Renovating historical and cultural blocks—a core area for urban quality enhancement—makes exploring their integration with surroundings highly significant. Existing studies on historical district research mainly focus on single-dimensional research such as protection policies, spatial structure analysis, and quality evaluation, lacking a systematic and quantitative evaluation of the spatial integration degree between historical and cultural blocks and their surrounding areas. To improve research on the integrated development of historical and cultural districts and their surrounding areas, this study employs deep learning and machine learning techniques to process street view images from 2721 data points in 2024, investigating the integration of Wuhan Hankou’s historical and cultural districts with their surrounding areas. The spatial integration degree between a historical and cultural district and its surroundings refers to the coordinated development level in terms of history and culture, spatial ecology, and transportation infrastructure. Specifically, the DeepLab v3+ model processes the blocks’ street view images to generate indicator data (Green Visual Index, Sky Visibility Index, Road Area Index, Spatial Enclosure Index, Color Richness (Wheel), Color Richness (Entropy), Spatial Accessibility Index, Vehicle Disturbance Index, Traffic Sign, which is used to quantify the historical culture, spatial ecology, and transportation facilities of historical and cultural blocks and their surrounding areas. The Coupling Coordination Degree model evaluates spatial integration, while the Geodetector Model quantitatively analyzes interactions between spatial integration and driving factors here. The results show that the spatial interaction and dependence between the Hankou Historical and Cultural District and its surrounding areas are relatively high, but spatial coordination is insufficient; the integration remains at a primary stage with structural contradictions. SVI, SEI, and RAI have a significant impact on integration, while Spatial Accessibility Index, Green Visual Index, and CRW have a moderate influence, and CRE, Vehicle Disturbance Index, and Traffic Signs have a relatively weak impact. Among them, SVI exhibits the strongest interactive effect with other indicators and plays a leverage role in improving integration.
Xu et al. (Sun,) studied this question.