Abstract ABSTRACT: The inability to estimate stockholder wealth effect magnitudes and hence disentangle them from changes in the stock market's assessment of the probability that a regulatory change will occur has hampered previous research in the economic consequences of accounting choices. This study measures cash flow effects independent of stock market behavior and thereby permits evidence of significant abnormal return behavior to be used to infer changes in the market's probability assessment of the imposition of a regulatory change, The study uses a seemingly unrelated regressions approach to investigate information events surrounding the issuance of IRS Revenue Procedure 80-55, Issued in late 1980, this rule stated that banks could no longer deduct interest paid on governmental time deposits collateralized by tax-exempt securities. Further, it was to be applied retroactively; and for firms in the sample used in this study, the average estimated tax liability caused by the retroactive provision was 24. 2 million, or 5. 6 percent of the market value of common stock. In addition to contributing to the economic consequences literature, this study also demonstrates the potential usefulness of capital market data in estimating the magnitude of probability revisions associated with IRS actions. Presumably such evidence is a relevant input in the social choice problem of whether an IRS action has imposed a "substantial impact" on affected parties.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Silvia A. Madeo
Morton Pincus
University of California, Irvine
The Accounting Review
Washington University in St. Louis
University of Iowa
College of Accounting
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Madeo et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ba44154e9516ffd37a5eeb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-4506712
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: