Urban Air Mobility (UAM) introduces new safety challenges as small unmanned aircrafts begin to operate at high density in complex urban environments. Traditional air traffic management (ATM) systems developed for manned aviation are unable to accommodate the autonomy, mission diversity, and dynamic obstacle conditions typical of low-altitude operations. This review examines recent research on mid-air collision risk and airspace safety modeling for UAM and identifies key challenges in adapting existing safety concepts to small-scale and autonomous flight. The study compares international management frameworks of the United States, Europe, and China. Then analyzes representative airspace structures such as Free, Layered, Zoned, and Pipeline configurations. It further reviews deterministic and probabilistic separation models, geometric and optimization-based avoidance strategies, and structured airspace approaches such as the virtual-tube concept for coordinated swarm navigation. The findings highlight the lack of integrated models that couple human, energy, and communication factors into quantitative risk assessment. The paper concludes by outlining future research needs in uncertainty modeling, digital-twin simulation, and interoperability to support safe and scalable UAM development.
Li et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: