This study explores the viability of condensate petroleum, an ultra-light hydrocarbon derived from natural gas production, as an alternative diesel engine fuel. The researchers tested six different fuel blends, increasing the condensate volume by 10% increments, in a compression ignition engine under three distinct load conditions (25%, 50%, and 75%) to evaluate both combustion characteristics and emission performance. The results demonstrate that condensate blends significantly enhance key combustion parameters. The heat release rate, in-cylinder pressure, and in-cylinder temperature all increased, with the highest heat release rate improvement of 35.6% observed at a 75% load using a 60% condensate petroleum blend. However, increasing the condensate ratio also extended ignition delay times and raised the ringing intensity, which peaked with a 34.7% increase at a 25% load. Brake thermal efficiency improved at lower and medium loads—achieving a maximum 11.2% increase with the 50% condensate petroleum blend at 50% load—but decreased when the engine reached 75% load. In terms of environmental impact, the condensate blends proved largely beneficial. Carbon monoxide emissions dropped by 57.9% (at 75% load, 60% condensate petroleum), smoke opacity decreased by 72.6% (at 25% load, 40% condensate petroleum), and hydrocarbons fell by 34.4% (at 50% load, 60% condensate petroleum). The primary drawback was that nitrogen oxide emissions worsened, increasing by 20.4% at 75% load with the 50% condensate petroleum blend. Overall, the study concludes that the effects of condensate petroleum are highly acceptable, making it a promising alternative fuel and additive for diesel engines.
Öztürk et al. (Tue,) studied this question.