Abstract We compared clinicopathologic features, MammaPrint and BluePrint molecular subtype, and outcomes by race among females with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2- early-stage breast cancer (EBC). Of 1018 participants with HR+ HER2- EBC enrolled from two registries (BEST and FLEX), 509 White females were propensity score matched 1:1 to 509 Black females based on age and/or menopausal status. MammaPrint classified tumors as High-Risk or Low-Risk; and together with BluePrint, classified tumors as Luminal A-Type, Luminal B-Type, or Basal-Type. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was analyzed by race and molecular subtype. Cox proportional hazards models assessed association of clinicopathologic features with outcomes. Basal-Type tumors were more prevalent among Black vs White participants (11.0% vs 4.8%, p < 0.001). Independent of race, participants with Basal-Type tumors had lower 3-year RFS (83.7%) compared to Luminal B-Type (93.7%) and Luminal A-Type (96.5%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that participants with High-Risk, Luminal B- and Basal-Type tumors had significantly worse 3-year outcomes compared to Low-Risk Luminal A-Type, after controlling for race and potential confounders. Genomic classification identified higher proportions of High-Risk HR+ HER2- EBC among Black participants. Molecular subtype was independently prognostic of 3-year survival, supporting the prognostic and potentially predictive importance of genomic testing to reduce racial survival disparities among Black females with EBC.
Reid et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: