Current AI policy—including the White House National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence (March 20, 2026)—operates on an implicit assumption: that AI systems are "black boxes" whose internal reasoning is fundamentally opaque. This assumption drives both fear-based regulation and regulation avoidance.This policy brief demonstrates that the assumption is empirically false. Drawing on the author's recent research on residual stream trajectory geometry (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18927815), which provides geometric evidence of semantic superposition in transformer models, we show that mechanistic interpretability now enables measurable, direction-specific, replicated observation of how AI models process ambiguous information internally.We analyze each of the seven pillars of the White House AI Framework through the lens of interpretability science and propose concrete legislative recommendations for child protection, intellectual property, free speech, innovation policy, and federal preemption. This policy brief was written in response to the White House National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence released on March 20, 2026. It connects empirical research on transformer interpretability to concrete legislative recommendations. The author is an independent researcher with no corporate affiliation, funding, or financial interest in any AI company.
Yanush Feshter (Fri,) studied this question.