Introduction: Iatrogenic Withdrawal Syndrome affects over 100,000 children annually, particularly following mechanical ventilation termination. Current nursing-based screening is time-consuming and episodic, limited by staffing availability. We developed and validated a computable phenotype using standard electronic health record variables to identify withdrawal through autonomic dysregulation patterns and medication histories. Methods: This single-center, retrospective and prospective multi-cohort study included PICU patients from 2012-2025. Training/testing cohorts comprised 2,100 patients (2012-2023), with prospective validation in 400 patients (2023-2025). Inclusion criteria: extubation from mechanical ventilation and Withdrawal Assessment Tool (WAT-1) evaluation. Data were organized into 4-hour epochs. Variables included vital signs metrics (average, maximum, minimum, measurement frequency) and opioid/sedative exposures (cumulative dose, prior 4-hour dosage, average 4-hour dose). WAT-1 scores ≥3 defined withdrawal. Machine learning utilized XGBoost algorithm. Results: Test cohort performance: AUROC 0.87, AUPRC 0.62, calibration curve R2 0.96 (slope 1.08, intercept -0.02). Prospective validation maintained performance despite lower withdrawal prevalence: AUROC 0.85, AUPRC 0.35, calibration R2 0.93 (slope 1.19, intercept -0.09). Pearson’s correlation between computable phenotype risk and WAT-1 scores: r = 0.95 (p < 0.05). Prediction accuracy exceeded 87% at high/low WAT-1 values and ranged 54.8-73.3% near diagnostic thresholds. Conclusions: We successfully developed and validated a novel machine learning computable phenotype using standard EHR data for pediatric ICU withdrawal risk identification. This objective, personalized approach demonstrated clinically suitable performance metrics with potential for real-time monitoring while reducing nursing administrative burden. The model’s reliance on autonomic dysregulation indicators and medication profiles enables continuous, automated withdrawal surveillance in critically ill children.
Patel et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: