This article investigates the mechanism by which externalized memory is transformed into an autonomous agent that displaces the subject — and interprets this mechanism as a reproduction of the structure described in the Gnostic tradition as the counterfeit spirit ( , antimimon pneuma). The central thesis holds that the pharmakon of memory becomes a counterfeit spirit through a three-stage process — externalization, autonomization, and substitution — whereby the gradualism of this process renders the substitution unrecognizable. The analysis unfolds across two scales: the empirical (algorithmic doubles in platform economies, educational shifts driven by the delegation of cognitive functions to AI tools, media practices of "resurrecting" the dead) and the narrative (science-fiction media texts that thematize the conflict between a subject and their own double). The article shows how the platform functions as a contemporary archon: by owning the subject's externalized memory, it produces a predictive model that acts in the subject's name, shapes their environment, and determines their behavior — not by opposing the subject, but by imitating them from within. The study employs a three-axis methodology synthesizing the philosophy of memory and technics (Plato, Derrida, Stiegler), critical theory of alienation (Marx, Lazzarato, Srnicek, Zuboff, iek), and Gnostic hermeneutics as the central analytical framework. The scientific novelty lies in the first systematic application of Gnostic hermeneutics to the analysis of digital doubling. A system of DD1–DD4 indicators is introduced and operationalized, enabling the figure of the counterfeit spirit to be described across heterogeneous material. The concept of a double archontic blockade is advanced: the digital double in the position of pseudo-Self and AI in the position of pseudo-Other together form a closed structure that deprives the subject of both authentic self-recognition and authentic encounter with the Other. A distinction is drawn between the medium (body) and the limit (origin) of alienation: the body is modifiable and functions as the medium of Gnostic resistance, whereas origin — that which is transmitted through birth — resists both externalization and archontic imitation. Sovereignty over externalized memory is identified as the key variable determining whether the pharmakon operates as remedy or as poison.
Alexey Igorevich Pozharov (Thu,) studied this question.