This study proposes solutions on how to incorporate Indonesian Geographical Indication (GI) law into the national quality assurance system based on local and export market requirements. The author found misalignments in quality assurance between GI law and the national quality assurance system. Although GI products have passed the quality assessment by the government competent authority, the GI law itself is not a part of the national quality assurance system. Furthermore, even though GI products are legally protected as long as their quality and reputation can be maintained, there is no quality control body associated with GI quality assurance in trading activities in the market. So far, the GI, as a form of intellectual property under the Indonesian legal system, protects only names and logos. Therefore, it is suggested that a quality control body be adopted within the framework oflndonesian GI law to ensure that the quality of GI products on the market is the same as that which is claimed in the GI description document. Moreover, as the export market is the target for GI products, the accreditation of the control body should conform to related international standards.
ジャトラニングルム et al. (Tue,) studied this question.