This study investigates the mechanisms and sociocultural foundations underlying the popularization of Russian cultural heritage abroad (specifically within the United States and Europe) through the integrated lenses of cultural philosophy and theoretical museology. Operating under conditions of severe institutional fragmentation and detachment from the national museum apparatus, diasporic heritage functions within a complex paradigm of "distributed museality." The article conceptualizes popularization not as a secondary utilitarian endeavor, but as a fundamental ontological prerequisite for preserving artifacts and cultural meanings in exogenous environments. Heritage is theorized not as a static repository of objects requiring physical conservation, but as a dynamic, continuous process of social recognition, axiological reproduction, and cultural actualization. The methodology relies on socio-philosophical analysis, anthropological approaches, and contemporary museological frameworks. Empirical data from the US and Europe serve to identify ontological patterns of diasporic memory survival via a structural-functional analysis of heritage management practices. The study’s scientific novelty lies in the philosophical redefinition of popularization, positing it as a core element of sustainable sociocultural reproduction rather than a peripheral supplement to preservation efforts. Popularization is systematically framed as an independent managerial contour integrating documentation, interpretation, and communication—acting as an effective mechanism of "secondary museification." Findings indicate that within an institutional vacuum, heritage viability relies exclusively on cultivating regimes of public visibility. The research highlights the crucial role of diasporic communities and non-governmental actors who, through participatory practices, act as key transmitters of collective identity. Ultimately, the article demonstrates that the most effective preservation models are hybrid strategies synthesizing grassroots initiatives, professional museum expertise, and digital technologies. Popularization thus emerges as the foundational mechanism ensuring the uninterrupted transmission of meaning, transmuting disparate artifacts into the living fabric of intercultural dialogue.
Aleksandr Vladimirovich Molodin (Sun,) studied this question.