The deployment of large language models (LLMs) in consequential analytical domains — geopolitical risk, conflict early warning, crisis monitoring — exposes a structural gap between model capability and analytical reliability. General-purpose AI systems are subject to well-documented epistemic failure modes, including overconfident scoring, rhetorical inflation, causal reversal, and lagging-indicator misclassification 3, 9, 21. These failures are not incidental; they are artifacts of single-model architectures in which no structural mechanism exists to challenge, correct, or falsify model outputs before they are accepted as conclusions. This paper introduces NETJERU, a multi-agent intelligence analysis framework that addresses this gap through epistemic function separation, code-level constraint enforcement, and a mandatory human approval checkpoint between analytical and judgment phases. NETJERU routes each analytical query through a sequenced council of seven functionally distinct agents — Isis, Thoth, Set, Osiris, Anubis, Horus, and Ra — each named for an Egyptian deity whose mythological role reflects its analytical function. Agents are constrained by the Dynamic Systemic Stress Matrix (DSSM), a four-dimensional scoring model assessing Symbolic Regulation Failure (SRF), Institutional Collapse (IC), AI Governance Fragmentation (AGF), and Macro Symbolic Shift (MSS) 20. The system's key architectural innovations include an adversarial self-audit layer (Set) with algorithmically enforced challenge strength caps, structural fingerprint retrieval for historical analogues (Osiris), a mandatory human approval gate (Horus) that cannot be bypassed in code, and a falsifiability requirement at the final judgment stage (Ra) 15. Critical constraints are implemented at the code level rather than the prompt level, ensuring they cannot be overridden by model output. NETJERU represents a principled approach to human-AI collaborative analysis in high-stakes domains, treating AI failure modes as first-class system concerns rather than afterthoughts.
ANTHONY VONDOOM (Thu,) studied this question.