This paper examines the enforcement of administrative judicial decisions by public authorities as a decisive test of the rule of law. It explains how delays or refusals to execute judgments weaken judicial authority and undermine citizens’ trust. The author analyzes common justifications for non‑execution, including administrative discretion and institutional constraints, and highlights their limits when they lead to systematic inertia. The study then reviews the legal framework governing execution and the potential consequences of non‑compliance, including forms of administrative liability and corrective mechanisms. It concludes by arguing for clearer and more effective enforcement pathways that ensure decisions produce timely, concrete effects.
Maimoun Yechou (Fri,) studied this question.