Background: Cardiovascular Diseases are the main cause of death, with obesity being an important risk factor predicted to rise markedly in the coming years. In this context, technology-based interventions have been developed as an alternative to face-to-face interventions. Objective: We aimed to systematically review and evaluate the effectiveness of digital interventions compared with conventional in-person approaches for weight loss in adults with overweight or obesity, ensuring comparable intensity and frequency. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed and Scopus databases up to April 2025, using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Selected studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, and prospective studies in adults (body mass index BMI ≥25 kg/m 2 ) with interventions delivered through applications, websites, videocalls, wearables, chatbots, or similar tools, compared against exclusively face-to-face interventions of matched intensity and frequency. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251249135). Results: Of the 12 eligible studies (1.932 participants), 7 were RCTs. Most trials (83%) indicated no significant differences in weight loss results between digital and face-to-face groups, with equivalent reductions observed in BMI, body weight, waist circumference, and body fat percentage. Two studies demonstrated the superiority of traditional interventions. Conclusion: Digital interventions result in comparable short-term effectiveness to face-to-face approaches for weight loss in adults. However, the evidence is supported by a small number of low-quality studies. Future studies are necessary to confirm and generalize these findings, identify the most effective digital strategies, and determine optimal intervention duration.
Athanasopoulou et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: