Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... .... 633 MECHANISMS ..... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... ........ ........ .... 636 Photosystem Il Inacti vaJion, Damage and Recovery: The DI Story 637 A voidance of PSll Damage: The Xanthophyll Cycle Story .... 640 Damage rmd A voidance: A Blurring of the Division . . . . . . ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 643 PHOTOINHIBITION IN THE FIELD AND OPEN OCEAN . . . .. ... .. . .. .... .... . . . . . . . . .... 644 Terrestrial VegetaJion .. .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... .... . . . . . . . . .... .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 644 Phytoplankton 646 SIGNIFICANCE TO PRODUCTION: A MODELING APPROACH 648 OBSERVED CHANGES IN PRODUCTION ....... . . . .... ........ 653 PHOTO INHIBITION AND PLANT DISTRIBUTIONS .... .... .... .... .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 654 CONCLUSIONS .... .... .... .... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ .... .... .... .... ........ .... ........ 655
Long et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: