Paper 3 in The Human Layer series. This paper provides a scoring and assessment framework for measuring whether human oversight in AI systems is structurally sound. It introduces a risk-tiered maturity model (five components, five levels, three risk tiers), identity anchoring requirements, compliance traceability specifications, escalation threshold calibration, and a floor-based scoring methodology designed to prevent organizations from averaging away architectural weaknesses. The framework addresses adversarial resilience through verification sampling with probe safety constraints, dual-track calibration for delayed ground truth environments, and telemetry governance principles. It includes a self-assessment instrument for immediate operational use. Paper 1 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19119699) established the economic and institutional case. Paper 2 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19120077) specified the architecture. This paper operationalizes both into a measurable, auditable standard.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad Noureddine
Union Bank of Switzerland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ahmad Noureddine (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895206c1944d70ce06174 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19453026