Background: Ecuador is a genetically diverse population setting shaped by long-term interactions among Native American, European, and African populations across distinct ecological regions. Although multiple studies have examined ancestry patterns in Ecuadorian populations, the available evidence remains fragmented and methodologically heterogeneous. Objective: To systematically identify, critically appraise, and synthesize published studies on genetic ancestry and population structure in Ecuador. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, SciELO, and Google Scholar through 31 January 2026. Eligible studies reported extractable ancestry-related data from Ecuadorian populations using autosomal, mitochondrial DNA, Y-chromosomal, or other ancestry-relevant genetic markers. Methodological quality was assessed using an adapted Joanna Briggs Institute framework. Owing to substantial heterogeneity across marker systems, sampling strategies, and ancestry inference methods, findings were synthesized qualitatively rather than by meta-analysis. Results: Of 1243 records identified, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Across marker systems, the evidence consistently supported a three-way admixture framework involving Native American, European, and African ancestry components, together with substantial regional and population-specific heterogeneity. Autosomal studies generally showed higher Native American ancestry in Highland and Native American populations, whereas African ancestry was more prominent in Afro-Ecuadorian and some Coastal populations. Uniparental markers further supported persistent sex-biased admixture, with predominant Native American maternal lineages and comparatively greater European or African paternal contributions depending on region and population history. Conclusions: Ecuadorian populations share a broad three-way admixture framework, but with marked internal heterogeneity across regions and population groups. These findings highlight the importance of geographic and demographic context in ancestry interpretation and the need for larger, more balanced, and methodologically standardized genomic studies in Ecuador.
Fabricio González-Andrade (Fri,) studied this question.