Post-quantum cryptography (PQC) artifacts are one to three orders of magnitude larger than their classical counterparts and must be segmented via ISO-TP across a shared CAN-FD bus while coexisting with periodic safety-critical traffic. No prior work has quantitatively mapped the transport-level feasibility of these artifacts under realistic multi-electronic control unit (ECU) contention. This paper presents a validated discrete-event simulator and evaluates 29 parameter sets from nine algorithm families—spanning the KpqC final portfolio, NIST FIPS 203–205 standards, and the draft FIPS 206—across 534 scenarios classified as feasible, borderline, or infeasible. Results show that key encapsulation mechanism (KEM) feasibility is scenario-dependent: domain scale and startup coordination dominate over algorithm choice, with 4-ECU staggered deployments feasible for all Level-1 candidates, while 16-ECU simultaneous startup is universally infeasible. For digital signatures, FN-DSA achieves the best transport feasibility due to its compact signature, while HQC is uniformly infeasible and SLH-DSA is nearly uniformly infeasible, quantifying the CAN-FD bandwidth premium of algorithmic diversity. System-side traffic shaping—staggered startup and reserved bus windows—outperforms algorithm substitution as a mitigation strategy. To the best of our knowledge, these findings constitute the first design-space map of PQC artifact transport on CAN-FD and provide actionable deployment guidelines for post-quantum transition.
Lee et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: