Contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation for upper limb motor impairment in people after stroke
Key Points
The review aims to assess the benefits and harms of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation compared to neuromuscular electrical stimulation for upper limb motor impairment after stroke.
Cochrane Review protocol for analyzing intervention techniques
Comparison of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Evaluation of outcomes related to upper limb motor function
Assessment of both benefits and potential harms
Current literature suggests potential improvements in motor function with electrical stimulation techniques.
Comparative risks and benefits of CCFES versus NMES are yet to be fully explored.
Further studies are required to clarify relative effectiveness.
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES) compared with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) for upper limb motor impairment in people after stroke.
Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health2013 · 1,622 citations