Minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) is a promising green technology for high-speed milling of GH4169. However, the full-chain oil mist penetration mechanism remains unclear, limiting precise parameter regulation. Based on a cross-scale mechanism, this study develops a semi-empirical oil mist penetration efficiency model coupling four key parameters and conducts single-factor and orthogonal high-speed milling experiments to validate the model and analyze the regulation mechanism using milling force and surface roughness. The experimental results show relative deviations below 6%, demonstrating good model validity and robustness. The influence hierarchy is spindle speed > nozzle orientation > nozzle angle > nozzle distance. Spindle speed and nozzle orientation are strongly coupled dominant parameters with a “drive-adaptation” mechanism, while nozzle distance and nozzle angle are weakly coupled, only notable under extreme conditions. The optimal parameters obtained via BP neural network and NSGA-II are nozzle orientation −X, angle 22.43°, distance 14.96 mm, and spindle speed 16,581 rpm. Under this combination, minimum Surface Roughness Ra of 0.17 μm and milling force of 24.27 N are achieved, reducing surface roughness by 85.32% and milling force by 53.52% versus the worst condition and reducing roughness by 28.57% versus the baseline while maintaining milling force within a reasonable range. This study clarifies the physical mechanism of MQL oil mist penetration, extending conventional macroscopic parameter optimization. The proposed cross-scale framework offers theoretical and engineering guidance for MQL parameter design in green precision machining of nickel-based superalloys.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
W. P. Mei
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Ziyang Cao
Qingdao University
Xin Zhao
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Machines
Suzhou Research Institute
Suzhou University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mei et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69db37df4fe01fead37c6014 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/machines14040420
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: