Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The increasing cost of commercial fertilizers and environmental problems associated with improper fertilization management have prompted the need to re‐examine commercial N sources that can effectively supply N to pastures while minimizing N losses. This 3‐year study evaluated the effects of selected N sources on bahiagrass ( P aspalum notatum F lügge) responses, soil properties and N losses. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of 6 N sources (i) ammonium nitrate (AN), (ii) ammonium sulphate (AS), (iii) urea (U), (iv) urea treated with A grotain (U + Agrotain), (v) SuperU and (vi) ammonium sulphate nitrate and 3 N levels (0, 60 or 120 kg ha −1 year −1 ), replicated three times. Bahiagrass dry‐matter yield ( DMY ), crude protein ( CP ) concentration, N uptake and recovery were not affected by N source, with the exception of AN that resulted in reduced DMY in 2010 compared with the other sources. Bahiagrass DMY , CP concentration, N uptake and recovery increased linearly as N levels increased. Nitrogen fertilization showed no effect on soil pH or soil N accumulation. Soil pore‐water N concentrations from treatments fertilized with N were similar to the control plots indicating no threat to the environment. At the N levels evaluated in this study, selection of N source should be based on the fertilizer cost.
Silveira et al. (Sat,) studied this question.