PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 4, 2010Global Ecology and Biogeography632 citationsOpen Access

Global patterns in the vulnerability of ecosystems to vegetation shifts due to climate change

View Full Paper
PGPatrick GonzálezRNRonald P. NeilsonJLJames M. Lenihan

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aim Climate change threatens to shift vegetation, disrupting ecosystems and damaging human well‐being. Field observations in boreal, temperate and tropical ecosystems have detected biome changes in the 20th century, yet a lack of spatial data on vulnerability hinders organizations that manage natural resources from identifying priority areas for adaptation measures. We explore potential methods to identify areas vulnerable to vegetation shifts and potential refugia. Location Global vegetation biomes. Methods We examined nine combinations of three sets of potential indicators of the vulnerability of ecosystems to biome change: (1) observed changes of 20th‐century climate, (2) projected 21st‐century vegetation changes using the MC1 dynamic global vegetation model under three Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emissions scenarios, and (3) overlap of results from (1) and (2). Estimating probability density functions for climate observations and confidence levels for vegetation projections, we classified areas into vulnerability classes based on IPCC treatment of uncertainty. Results One‐tenth to one‐half of global land may be highly (confidence 0.80–0.95) to very highly (confidence ≥ 0.95) vulnerable. Temperate mixed forest, boreal conifer and tundra and alpine biomes show the highest vulnerability, often due to potential changes in wildfire. Tropical evergreen broadleaf forest and desert biomes show the lowest vulnerability. Main conclusions Spatial analyses of observed climate and projected vegetation indicate widespread vulnerability of ecosystems to biome change. A mismatch between vulnerability patterns and the geographic priorities of natural resource organizations suggests the need to adapt management plans. Approximately a billion people live in the areas classified as vulnerable.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

González et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc719f98c6111533e530achttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00558.x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO 2 emissions2007 · 1,790 citations
  2. 2Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability2007 · 9,176 citations
  3. 3Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary2000 · 403 citations
  4. 4A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems2003 · 11,295 citations
  5. 5Anthropogenic climate change for 1860 to 2100 simulated with the HadCM3 model under updated emissions scenarios2003 · 588 citations