September 20, 2016Open Access

Reporting of Adverse Events in Published and Unpublished Studies of Health Care Interventions: A Systematic Review

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

There is strong evidence that much of the information on adverse events remains unpublished and that the number and range of adverse events is higher in unpublished than in published versions of the same study. The inclusion of unpublished data can also reduce the imprecision of pooled effect estimates during meta-analysis of adverse events.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Golder et al. (Tue,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd259e7a14526fc01336d1 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002127

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews2013 · 957 citations
2Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data2004 · 1,067 citations
3Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide2014 · 10,593 citations
4Group art therapy as an adjunctive treatment for people with schizophrenia: multicentre pragmatic randomised trial2012 · 228 citations
5A comparison of three different sources of data in assessing the frequencies of adverse reactions to amiodarone2004 · 59 citations

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper