June 28, 2017Open Access

Curative Resection of Single Primary Hepatic Malignancy: Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Category LR-M Portends a Worse Prognosis

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Patients with tumors preoperatively categorized as LR-M may have a worse prognosis than those with tumors categorized LR-3, LR-4, or LR-5 after curative resection of single hepatic malignancy.

Read Full Paperexternally

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

An et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69de537f7ed287395e558818 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.16.17478

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma2016 · 99 citations
2Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: what the radiologist needs to know about biphenotypic liver carcinoma2014 · 65 citations
3Human hepatocellular carcinomas with “Stemness”-related marker expression: keratin 19 expression and a poor prognosis2011 · 336 citations
4Heterogeneous Type 4 Enhancement of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Dynamic CT Is Associated With Tumor Recurrence After Radiofrequency Ablation2011 · 59 citations
5Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma (Biphenotypic) Tumors: Imaging Features and Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced CT and MRI2013 · 189 citations

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper