July 7, 2010Open Access

A Review of Online Evidence-based Practice Point-of-Care Information Summary Providers

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Publishers are moving to develop point-of-care summary products. Some of these have better profiles than others, and there is room for improved reporting of the strengths and weaknesses of these products.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Banzi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69decb9d488ed2d92be93eb6 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1288

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Using the World Wide Web to answer clinical questions: how efficient are different methods of information retrieval?1999 · 22 citations
2Physicians' use of computer software in answering clinical questions.1993 · 51 citations
3Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study2008 · 2,555 citations
4Social Science Research Network2007 · 601 citations
5Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement1999 · 4,824 citations

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper