Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We prove that the classic policy-iteration method Howard, R. A. 1960. Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes. MIT, Cambridge and the original simplex method with the most-negative-reduced-cost pivoting rule of Dantzig are strongly polynomial-time algorithms for solving the Markov decision problem (MDP) with a fixed discount rate. Furthermore, the computational complexity of the policy-iteration and simplex methods is superior to that of the only known strongly polynomial-time interior-point algorithm Ye, Y. 2005. A new complexity result on solving the Markov decision problem. Math. Oper. Res. 30(3) 733–749 for solving this problem. The result is surprising because the simplex method with the same pivoting rule was shown to be exponential for solving a general linear programming problem Klee, V., G. J. Minty. 1972. How good is the simplex method? Technical report. O. Shisha, ed. Inequalities III. Academic Press, New York, the simplex method with the smallest index pivoting rule was shown to be exponential for solving an MDP regardless of discount rates Melekopoglou, M., A. Condon. 1994. On the complexity of the policy improvement algorithm for Markov decision processes. INFORMS J. Comput. 6(2) 188–192, and the policy-iteration method was recently shown to be exponential for solving undiscounted MDPs under the average cost criterion. We also extend the result to solving MDPs with transient substochastic transition matrices whose spectral radii are uniformly below one.
Yinyu Ye (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: