Ri (root-inducing) technology, mediated by Rhizobium rhizogenes , presents a promising approach for modifying plant architecture. However, a comprehensive understanding of how complete, integrated wild-type T-DNA alters plant physiology is still lacking, as most related research has focused on partial gene sets and single species. To address this gap, our study undertakes the first systematic, comparative analysis of Ri genotypes across the phylogenetically distant species of rose ( Rosa hybrida L.) and potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.). We aimed to correlate organ-specific T-DNA gene expression with hormonal profiles and growth traits, thereby identifying both the general mechanisms of the Ri phenotype and species-specific differences. Morphological, molecular, and hormonal data were collected from three plant organs—leaves, stems, and roots—and analyzed across multiple Ri genotypes generated by R. rhizogenes strain ATCC 15834. All the Ri genotypes contained T L (left T-DNA) but differed in the presence of T R (right T-DNA) sequences. Compared with the respective wild-type plants, the Ri genotypes consistently presented shorter internodes (ratio of 0.5–0.89), in most cases smaller leaves (ratio of 0.52–1.03) and greater in vitro root formation (ratio of 0.71–2.34), as well as diverse expression levels of the rol and aux2 genes, a consistently higher concentration of cytokinins and altered levels of stress-related hormones in specific organs. Correlation and principal component analyses confirmed the relationships among rol gene expression, root number, and reduced shoot growth, whereas hormone responses were species-specific. Together, these findings complement the characteristics of typical Ri plants shown in previous studies and provide new insights into the underlying hormonal and genetic mechanisms, indicating altered stress signaling pathways in Ri genotypes. The first evaluations of root hair data in Ri plants contradict assumptions about a hairy root phenotype but also indicate an increased root tip diameter (ratio of 1.06–1.23) compared with that of the wild-type. Together, these findings underscore the importance of balancing architectural benefits with potential physiological trade-offs in the use of Ri technology for future breeding applications.
Rüter et al. (Wed,) studied this question.