Background and Objectives: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and is frequently associated with intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD). Current therapeutic strategies are primarily symptomatic and do not restore native disc biology, largely due to the avascular nature of the intervertebral disc and the hostile inflammatory and mechanical microenvironment that characterizes degeneration. The aim of this study is to provide an updated and clinically oriented overview of the pathophysiology of IVDD and to evaluate the current evidence on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-based therapies. Materials and Methods: A focused narrative literature review was performed to evaluate current evidence on MSC- and PRP-based therapies for intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD). The search was conducted in PubMed. Only studies in English were considered eligible. Results: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrated regenerative and immunomodulatory effects primarily through paracrine mechanisms, enhancing extracellular matrix synthesis and reducing inflammation and apoptosis. MSC-derived extracellular vesicles emerged as a promising cell-free alternative, potentially overcoming limitations related to cell survival and safety. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) showed anabolic and anti-inflammatory properties, promoting disc cell proliferation and matrix production, particularly in early-stage degeneration. Clinical studies, including randomized trials, reported significant improvements in pain and function for both MSC and PRP therapies, with favourable safety profiles. However, heterogeneity in treatment protocols and limited long-term data remain significant limitations. Orthobiologic therapies represent a minimally invasive option for patients with discogenic low back pain refractory to conservative treatment. Patient selection is crucial and should consider degeneration stage, disc viability, and clinical presentation. PRP is primarily indicated in early-stage degeneration (Pfirrmann II–III), whereas MSC-based therapies may be considered in selected patients with more advanced but still viable discs. Based on current evidence, a stepwise approach is proposed, progressing from conservative management to PRP, MSCs, and ultimately surgery. Orthobiologics should be integrated within a multimodal strategy including rehabilitation. Conclusions: MSCs and PRP represent a promising and, eventually, complementary orthobiologic therapies for IVDD. PRP is primarily effective in early degenerative stages as a biologic stimulator, whereas MSCs may provide regenerative benefits in more advanced but still viable discs. Further studies are necessary to standardize protocols and confirm long-term efficacy and safety.
Conza et al. (Wed,) studied this question.