Rainfall is a significant input for several engineering designs such as hydraulic structures, culverts, bridges and ducts, rainfall water sewer, and highway drainage system. The detailed statistical analysis of extreme daily rainfall of each arid environment’s region is essential to estimate the relevant input value for designing and analyzing engineering structures and agricultural planning. This paper aims to assess the best-fitting distribution to estimate the design of rainfall depth (XT) and maximum rainfall values for different return periods (2, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150). This study used extreme daily rainfall historical data collected in period of 1970–2020, collected from four rainfall gauge stations nearby the Wadi Al-Aqiq that are selected for analysis; they are Al Faqir (J109), Umm Al Birak (J112), Madinah Munawara (M001), and Bir Al Mashi (M103). The methodology approved in this paper examined four frequency distributions, namely: GEV (Generalised Extreme Value), Gumbel, Weibull, and Pearson type III to identify the most suitable and extreme storm design depth corresponding to different return periods. The results demonstrate that GEV and Pearson Type 3 produce higher extremes values, while the Weibull method is commonly suggested in the HYFRAN-PLUS MODEL (DSS) for criterion suitability. The findings for the 100-year storm design demonstrate that extreme values generated by the Hyfran-Plus model are higher than the decision support system (DSS). All (DSS) comparative values are less than the maximum historical data from 1970–2020, except the Al Faqir station (DSS), which has a value of 79.6 mm that exceeds the historical maximum of 71 mm. This study will provide advantageous information about the study area for water resources planners, farmers, and urban engineers to assess water availability and create storage.
Aldrees et al. (Thu,) studied this question.