Abstract. This paper proposes a conceptual interpretation of the contemporary global condition through the notion of Haos, understood as a state of deep epistemic instability that exceeds conventional conspiracy-type explanations. Building on the concept of chaordic systems, originally introduced by Dee Hock, the study explores the dynamic coexistence of chaos and order within the evolution of human knowledge. The paper advances a theoretical model that combines a mental experiment with a systemic–cybernetic description of knowledge as a complex system structured by inputs (paradigms), outputs (institutionalized forms of knowledge), and feedback mechanisms. Under conditions of accelerating informational flows and communication networks, the structure of inputs becomes increasingly unstable, generating proliferations of incompatible conceptual elements (“holomers”) that destabilize established epistemic orders. Through references to major theoretical contributions — such as Poincaré’s reflections on unpredictability, Thom’s catastrophe theory, Prigogine’s dissipative structures, Lorenz’s chaos theory, and Kuhn’s paradigms — the paper argues that contemporary civilization has entered a chaordic phase characterized by the erosion of the modern hierarchy of knowledge dominated by natural science. The expansion of global communications and ideological competition among scientific, political, artistic, and mythic-theological forms of knowledge has produced a systemic crisis that can be interpreted as an epistemic Haos. The study concludes that such chaordic phases may precede singularities — structural transformations leading to new epistemic orders. Within this context, emerging interactions between human cognition and digital networks may generate a new form of collective or hybrid intelligence, potentially offering pathways either toward deeper disorder or toward a reconfigured epistemic equilibrium.
Manolescu Gorun (Fri,) studied this question.