The rise of deepfake technology presents significant problems to democratic dialogue, confidence in knowledge, and legal systems regulating consent. Deepfakes artificially created media can alter audio, video, and pictures with remarkable realism, frequently obscuring the boundary between reality and deception. This study analyzes the epistemological consequences of deepfakes on public reason, the deliberative process by which citizens participate in rational discourse about political and social matters. This analysis critically assesses the impact of deepfakes on informed consent, especially in scenarios where synthetic media is employed to distort political ideas, misrepresent individuals, or sway public opinion. This paper contends that current legal and ethical frameworks are inadequate to confront the emerging threats associated with synthetic political realities by synthesizing concepts from philosophy, information ethics, and constitutional theory. The study closes by recommending legislative interventions, regulatory initiatives, and epistemic protections aimed at preserving the integrity of democratic discussion and human autonomy in the digital era.
Jubaer Shah (Wed,) studied this question.