Music intervention for chronic pain requires standardized assessment schedules, consistent treatment doses, and intention-to-treat analysis to ensure robust and clinically applicable results.
Does music intervention improve pain, mood, sleep, and heart rate variability in patients with chronic pain?
This letter outlines methodological limitations, such as inconsistent assessment timing and lack of ITT analysis, in a recent trial evaluating music therapy for chronic pain.
Satwinder Kaur, Aarunee Srivastava, Sandeep Pattnaik Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, IndiaCorrespondence: Sandeep Pattnaik, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, Haryana, 133207, India, Email physiosandeep94@gmail.com
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Journal of Pain Research
Add This Paper to Your Research Feed
Any time a new paper drops it will be there.
Kaur et al. (Wed,) conducted a letter in Chronic pain. Music intervention vs. Control group was evaluated. Music intervention for chronic pain requires standardized assessment schedules, consistent treatment doses, and intention-to-treat analysis to ensure robust and clinically applicable results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: