The increasing participation of medical students and residents in neurosurgical research has amplified the importance of effective mentorship. Despite its relevance for both the mentor and trainee, mentorship in Neurosurgery frequently occurs informally, potentially creating gaps in clarity, feedback, and support. Drawing on perspectives from neurosurgeons committed to professional development and trainees with articulated expectations, we consolidate these views into strategies to enhance communication and mutual accountability. Complementing these principles, we present a structured four-stage research curriculum to guide progress according to the trainee's level of experience. By balancing structure with mutual understanding and open communication, this framework aims to elevate mentorship within academic Neurosurgery.
Mesina-Estarrón et al. (Thu,) studied this question.