This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Davide Cadelano’s Codex Alpha 3.0 English Version ICONOCLAST in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines the extent to which Cadelano’s informational ontology—centered on the notions of Telascura, coherence gradients, and the emergence of spacetime from a deeper informational structure—can be placed in dialogue with the modal axioms, cosmogonic theorem, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, and cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. The paper argues that Codex Alpha 3.0 is philosophically relevant because it rejects spacetime as an ultimate ontological foundation and seeks a deeper stratum of reality. From the standpoint of the Theory of Objectivity, this move opens important zones of compatibility, especially regarding relationality, emergent structure, and the role of information in physical manifestation. At the same time, the article identifies decisive tensions: the lack of a strict demonstration of modal necessity for the foundational entities of the model, the underdetermination of the genesis of the informational field itself, and the need for a clearer distinction between ontological foundation, inductive mechanism, and derived phenomenon. The analysis is articulated in confrontation with the foundational bibliography of the Theory of Objectivity, its recent developments concerning modal ontology and empirical testability, and a broader bibliography of support and dialogue involving modern physics, cosmology, and philosophy of science. The article concludes that Codex Alpha 3.0 should be understood not as a complete modal cosmogony, but as a fertile and provocative intermediate informational ontology, capable of contributing to contemporary debates on the deep structure of reality when critically examined under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. NoteThis analytical article benefited from the analytical support of ChatGPT. KeywordsTheory of Objectivity; Davide Cadelano; Codex Alpha 3.0; Telascura; informational ontology; spacetime emergence; modal ontology; cosmology; philosophy of physics; critical–propositional analysis; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; cosmogony; relational physics; foundations of physics
Cabannas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.