Higher HDL particle concentration, but not HDL cholesterol, remained independently associated with lower risk of incident CHD (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.93) after adjusting for LDL particles.
Cohort (n=5,598)
HDL particle concentration, but not HDL cholesterol, is independently associated with carotid intima-media thickness and incident coronary heart disease when adjusting for LDL particle concentration.
Effect estimate: HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.61-0.93)
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate independent associations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and particle (HDL-P) concentrations with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and incident coronary heart disease (CHD). BACKGROUND: HDL-C is inversely related to CHD, and also to triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL-P), and related metabolic risk. HDL-P associations with CHD may be partially independent of these factors. METHODS: In a multiethnic study of 5,598 men and women ages 45 to 84 years old, without baseline CHD, excluding subjects on lipid-lowering medications, triglycerides >400 mg/dl, or missing values, we evaluated associations of HDL-C and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy-measured HDL-P with cIMT and incident CHD (myocardial infarction, CHD death, and angina, n = 227 events; mean 6.0 years follow-up). All models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, hypertension, and smoking. RESULTS: HDL-C and HDL-P correlated with each other (ρ = 0.69) and LDL-P (ρ = -0.38, -0.25, respectively, p < 0.05 for all). For (1 SD) higher HDL-C (15 mg/dl) or HDL-P (6.64 μmol/l), cIMT differences were - 26.1 (95% confidence interval CI: -34.7 to -17.4) μm and -30.1 (95% CI: -38.8 to - 21.4) μm, and CHD hazard ratios were 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63 to 0.88) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.82), respectively. Adjusted for each other and LDL-P, HDL-C was no longer associated with cIMT (2.3; 95% CI: - 9.5 to 14.2 μm) or CHD (0.97; 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.22), but HDL-P remained independently associated with cIMT (-22.2; 95% CI: - 33.8 to -10.6 μm) and CHD (0.75; 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.93). Interactions by sex, ethnicity, diabetes, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Adjusting for each other and LDL-P substantially attenuated associations of HDL-C, but not HDL-P, with cIMT and CHD. Potential confounding by related lipids or lipoproteins should be carefully considered when evaluating HDL-related risk.
Mackey et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in without baseline CHD (n=5,598). High-density lipoprotein particle (HDL-P) concentration vs. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was evaluated on incident coronary heart disease (CHD) (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.93). Higher HDL particle concentration, but not HDL cholesterol, remained independently associated with lower risk of incident CHD (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.93) after adjusting for LDL particles.