Does grid mapping catheter compared to PentaRay catheter alter the estimation of bipolar voltage amplitude and low-voltage areas during left atrial mapping?
Grid mapping catheters estimate significantly larger bipolar voltage amplitudes compared to PentaRay catheters, potentially allowing for more selective identification of low-voltage areas.
INTRODUCTION: Areas displaying reduced bipolar voltage are defined as low-voltage areas (LVAs). Moreover, left atrial (LA) LVAs after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been reported as a predictor of recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). In this study, we compared grid mapping catheter (GMC) with PentaRay catheter (PC) for LA voltage mapping on Ensite Precision mapping system. METHODS: Twenty-six consecutive patients with LVAs and border zone within the LA were enrolled. After achieving PVI, voltage mapping under high right atrial pacing for 600 ms was performed twice using each catheter type (GMC first, PC next). Furthermore, LVA was defined as a region with a bipolar voltage of <0.50, and border zone was defined as a region with a bipolar voltage of <1.0, or <1.5 mV. RESULTS: 12.6, 35.0, p = .005). CONCLUSION: Bipolar voltage amplitude estimated by GMC was significantly larger than that estimated by PC on Ensite Precision mapping system. GMC may be able to find highly selective identification of LVAs with lower prevalence and smaller LVA and border zone size.
Saito et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: