Mg-doped ZnO (Zn1−xMgxO, x = 0.00–0.05) thin films were successfully grown on glass substrates with a c-axis orientation at 600 °C using the sol–gel dip-coating technique. The structural features, defect-related photoluminescence, and optical constants of the films were systematically investigated as a function of Mg concentration. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirmed a single-phase hexagonal wurtzite structure with a preferential (002) orientation for all compositions, indicating the successful substitution of Mg2+ ions into the ZnO lattice. The crystallite size (D002) was found to vary between 28.49 and 41.18 nm, while microstrain and stress exhibited non-monotonic behavior depending on Mg content. This behavior reveals a transition from compressive to tensile stress due to lattice distortion and defect formation. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra showed a dominant near-band-edge (NBE) ultraviolet emission, along with broad visible emissions extending from violet to red. Optical constants were accurately extracted using a double-facet-coated substrate (DFCS) model, combined with nonlinear curve fitting using the Nelder–Mead optimization algorithm. The films showed a strong absorption edge at about 370 nm and exceptional optical transparency (≈60–80%) in the visible spectrum. The systematic blue shift in the extinction coefficient with increasing Mg content confirms bandgap engineering in Zn1−xMgxO thin films. The refractive index dispersion was successfully modeled using the Cauchy relation, demonstrating composition-dependent tunable optical properties. Depending on the Mg content, the optical bandgap values ranged from approximately 3.265 to 3.315 eV. The band-edge states and optical constants are strongly affected by the combined effects of defect development, Mg-induced lattice distortion, and changes in optical dispersion. These results indicate that sol–gel-derived Mg-doped ZnO thin films with composition-dependent stress states, defect states, and tunable optical properties are promising candidates for UV photodetectors, optical coatings, and transparent optoelectronic devices.
Arda et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: