What does this research mean for the field?

Postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) have a high acceptance rate (34%) and a strong safety profile with low complication rates among parturient women, though lack of awareness remains a barrier. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

This study aims to determine the acceptance rate of postpartum IUCD insertion and to evaluate associated complications.

May 4, 2026Open Access

Acceptance of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device among the parturient and its safety: A prospective analysis from a tertiary care hospital in West Bengal

Key Points

This study aims to determine the acceptance rate of postpartum IUCD insertion and to evaluate associated complications.
Prospective interventional study conducted with 587 parturients undergoing childbirth
Data collection through questionnaires and follow-up cards
Chi-square test and descriptive statistics analyses using SPSS version 20
34% (202 of 587) of parturients accepted PPIUCD insertion
Majority of acceptors were aged 20–29 and had primary education, with 75% experiencing complaints at 6 weeks
No cases of perforation and low expulsion rates indicate a favorable safety profile

Abstract

Background: The modern intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) is a highly effective, safe, private, long-acting, coitus-independent, and rapidly reversible method of contraception with few side methods of contraception today. Aims and Objectives: This study was carried out to find out the proportion of women accepting postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices (PPIUCD) insertion and to describe the complications following insertion. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective, interventional study conducted during January-December 2025 among 587 parturient undergoing normal vaginal or cesarian deliveries in a Medical college of West Bengal. Data were collected by pre-designed and pre-tested questionnaire, a checklist, and a PPIUCD follow-up card. Collected data were entered into MS-Excel sheet, double checked, and principles of descriptive statistics were used. Chi-square test was done. For analysis, the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 20 was used. Results: Almost 34% (202 of 587) of the parturients accepted insertion of PPIUCD as a method of contraception. The majority of the PPIUCD acceptors were in the age range of 20–29 (48.51%), belonging to Muslim religion (56.93%), and were having primary level of education (90.1%). More than 75% were housewives. More than half (55.0%) of those women accepted PPIUCD due to its long-term effect. Majority of the acceptors wanted to have a pregnancy within the next 3–5 years. The majority of parturients (75%) had some complaints at 6 weeks. The difference between time of IUCD expulsion among the parturient accepting within 10 min, immediate, and trans cesarian insertions was statistically significant. The safety profile of PPIUCD was established with no reported cases of perforation, low expulsion rates, minimal instances of pelvic infection, and a few cases of lost strings. Conclusion: Although the acceptance of IUCD was considerably high lack of awareness regarding IUCD insertion is still the challenge in this modern age of contraception.

AI에게 질문

Bookmark

View Full Paper