Background. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative technology in healthcare, with growing interest in its applications within pediatric dentistry. Given the unique clinical, developmental, and behavioral characteristics of pediatric patients, AI-based systems may offer valuable support in improving diagnosis, prevention, and treatment planning. Methods. A narrative review was conducted to synthesize current evidence on AI applications in pediatric dentistry. A comprehensive search strategy, including predefined keywords and free terms, was applied across multiple databases (Embase, Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science) up to 1 January 2026. Reviews addressing AI-based technologies in pediatric dental care were selected and analyzed. Results. The available literature indicates that AI is being progressively applied across multiple domains of pediatric dentistry, although with varying levels of evidence. More extensively investigated areas include diagnostic imaging, caries detection, orthodontic assessment, and growth evaluation, where AI systems—particularly those based on machine learning and deep learning—have demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility. Other emerging fields, such as remote monitoring, behavioral management, preventive strategies, and patient education, show promising potential but remain less explored. Overall, AI-based tools appear to enhance diagnostic support, enable early detection of oral conditions, and contribute to more personalized and efficient clinical workflows. Conclusions. AI represents a rapidly evolving adjunct in pediatric dentistry with the potential to improve clinical decision-making, preventive care, and patient management. Despite encouraging results, further validation in real-world settings, along with careful consideration of ethical, legal, and data-related challenges, is required to support its responsible integration into routine clinical practice.
Antonino Lo Giudice (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: