BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib is standard first-line therapy for symptomatic myelofibrosis (MF). In real-world practice, dose reductions are common, and the impact of maintaining higher dose intensity over time remains incompletely characterized-particularly for patients escalated to 25 mg twice daily (50 mg/day; full dose). METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive MF patients (2015-2025) who received 25 mg BID at least once during their treatment course. Data were extracted from a structured institutional database linking baseline (DEMOGRAPHY) and visit-level longitudinal data (HISTORY), including dosing, supportive care, infections, transfusions, and spleen measurements. Dose-intensified exposure was defined as 40 mg/day or higher and was used to anchor t0 (first visit at 40 mg/day or higher), while full-dose exposure specifically referred to the approved maximum of 50 mg/day (25 mg twice daily). FRACEQ50 quantified sustained full-dose exposure as the fraction of visits at 50 mg/day. Analyses were descriptive. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included, with a median follow-up of 60. 9 months from ruxolitinib initiation. Based on FRACEQ50, 11/24 patients were classified as high-intensity (FRACEQ50 0. 50-1. 00), 6/24 as intermediate (0. 10-0. 49), and 7/24 as minimal (below 0. 10). For spleen-response analyses, baseline was defined as the first ultrasound spleen length recorded after t0 and was available in 22/24 patients; spleen response was evaluable in 21/24 (one patient lacked a follow-up ultrasound with spleen length in cm; two had no evaluable post-baseline spleen assessments). Spleen length decreased in 17/21 evaluable patients (81. 0%), while hematologic toxicities and supportive-care needs remained manageable across intensity groups. Four deaths occurred during follow-up, including one fatal COVID-19 case temporally associated with abrupt ruxolitinib discontinuation during ICU intubation. CONCLUSIONS: In selected MF patients, escalation to 25 mg BID with sustained full-dose intensity appears feasible in routine practice, with durable treatment exposure and manageable safety. These real-world data support further multicenter efforts to better characterize longitudinal dose exposure and its potential clinical implications, without implying causal relationships.
Mendicino et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: